Nissan Navara 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 40 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
| By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is smaller. Nissan Navara is 14 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1210 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`805 | 1`144 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |