Nissan Navara 2015 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Navara engine produces 45 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Navara consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 35 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 368 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 46 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |