Nissan Navara 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 9 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 5.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 10 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`010 kg | 2`850 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`958 kg | 1`860 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`052 kg | 990 kg | |
| Nissan Navara load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 6 procentiem more than Mitsubishi L 200. Therefore, Nissan Navara is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |