Nissan Navara 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 40 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | 229 mm (9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.71 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Navara is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |