Nissan Navara 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 450 NM | 375 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 40 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 8.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
By specification Nissan Navara consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Navara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
1330 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
800 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.30 m | 5.36 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Navara is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Navara is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1210 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 1`144 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 18 200 | 19 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |