Nissan Navara 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2012

 
Nissan Navara
2015 - 2019
Ford Ranger
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.3 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 190 HP150 HP
Torque: 450 NM375 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds12.3 seconds
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive.
Nissan Navara engine produces 40 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.08.5
Real fuel consumption: 10.0 l/100km9.6 l/100km
By specification Nissan Navara consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Navara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1140 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle
1330 km on highway1030 km on highway
800 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.30 m5.36 m
Width: 1.85 m1.85 m
Height: 1.81 m1.82 m
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Navara is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Navara is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data1210 litres
Turning diameter: 12.4 meters12.7 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger.
Gross weight (kg): 3`0101`144
Safety:
Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests.
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 19 80020 000
Pros and Cons: Nissan Navara has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Ranger has
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv