Nissan Navara 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 213 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Navara engine produces 23 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Ford Ranger. Due to the lower power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 8.9 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | 283 mm (11.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is smaller. Nissan Navara is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Nissan Navara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`010 kg | 3`130 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`958 kg | 2`510 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`052 kg | 620 kg | |
| Nissan Navara load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 41 procentiem more than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Nissan Navara is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |