Nissan Navara 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Ranger is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Navara engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Ranger. Due to the lower power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Navara is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 35 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |