Nissan Navara 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Navara consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Navara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Navara is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 32 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
| |