Nissan Navara 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volkswagen Amarok. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.6 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 3`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 34 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
| |