Nissan Navara 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Amarok is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Navara engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, but torque is 3 NM more than Volkswagen Amarok. Due to the lower power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.6 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 3`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 34 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |