Nissan Navara 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.0 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Navara is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 31 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
| |