Nissan Navara 1998 vs Volvo XC90 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Navara is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volvo XC90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Navara is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.0 | 2.4 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 - 148 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 - 314 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.2 - 14.0 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 42 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2404 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`737 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |