Nissan Navara 1998 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Navara is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi L 200 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Navara is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi L 200 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi L 200 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 - 148 HP | 87 - 132 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 - 314 NM | 154 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 23.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.7 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 58 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 19 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |