Nissan Navara 1998 vs Mazda BT-50 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.5 (diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Nissan Navara is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 - 148 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 - 314 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.9 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 15 cm longer than the Mazda BT-50, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda BT-50, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 3`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Mazda BT-50 has
| |