Nissan Navara 2019 vs Mazda BT-50 2020
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Navara is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda BT-50 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda BT-50 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 | 1.9 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 190 HP | 150 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 425 - 450 NM | 350 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 8.9 | 6.6 - 8.0 | |
|
On average, Nissan Navara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda BT-50. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 219 - 223 mm (8.6 - 8.8 inches) | 235 - 240 mm (9.3 - 9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda BT-50 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 3 cm longer than the Mazda BT-50, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda BT-50. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`250 kg | ~ 3`050 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`100 kg | ~ 1`912 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`150 kg | ~ 1`138 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda BT-50 has
| |