Nissan Navara 2019 vs Ford Ranger 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Navara is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Ranger can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Ranger also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 | 2.2 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 190 HP | 130 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 425 - 450 NM | 330 - 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 12.5 seconds | 10.3 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 7.0 | 7.0 - 8.7 | |
|
On average, Nissan Navara equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.31 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Navara is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`250 | ~ 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 35 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |