Nissan Navara 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Navara is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Amarok can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volkswagen Amarok also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 - 190 HP | 163 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 - 450 NM | 400 - 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 12 seconds | 7.4 - 10.9 seconds | |
| In general, Volkswagen Amarok are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Navara. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 7.0 | 7.8 - 10.9 | |
|
On average, Nissan Navara equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Nissan Navara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`010 kg | ~ 3`025 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`956 kg | ~ 2`090 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`054 kg | ~ 935 kg | |
| Nissan Navara load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Volkswagen Amarok. Therefore, Nissan Navara is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 33 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |