Nissan Navara 2015 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.3 (diesel) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 - 190 HP | 106 - 169 HP | |
Torque: | 403 - 450 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 12 seconds | 11.7 - 14.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 7.0 | 6.8 - 9.7 | |
On average, Nissan Navara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.30 m | 4.26 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 104 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 398 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 758 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 1.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`010 | ~ 2`057 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 19 800 | 5800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |