Nissan Navara 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 | 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 - 190 HP | 154 - 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 - 450 NM | 380 - 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 12 seconds | 10.4 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 7.0 | 7.1 - 7.5 | |
|
On average, Nissan Navara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | 200 - 205 mm (7.9 - 8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.30 m | 5.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 10 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`010 | ~ 2`864 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |