Nissan Navara 2005 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Nissan Navara is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Jeep Grand Cherokee has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Nissan Navara is available only with rear wheel drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.5 - 4.0 | 2.7 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 144 - 265 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
Torque: | 235 - 385 NM | 295 - 425 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 8.3 - 14 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 13.8 | 9.7 - 16.5 | |
Nissan Navara petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Nissan Navara equipped with diesel engines consume 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.22 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
Nissan Navara is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Navara is 61 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Navara is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`489 | ~ 2`447 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 6800 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |