Nissan Navara 2010 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Navara is available only with rear wheel drive, while Volkswagen Amarok can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 (diesel) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 231 HP | 122 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 - 550 NM | 300 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.7 seconds | 10.1 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 9.5 | 7.2 - 9.6 | |
|
On average, Nissan Navara equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.34 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`873 | ~ 2`844 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Navara scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Amarok is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Navara scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |