Nissan Navara 2010 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Navara is available with rear wheel drive, while Mitsubishi L 200 can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 | 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 231 HP | 136 - 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 - 550 NM | 314 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.7 seconds | 12.1 - 17.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 9.5 | 7.7 - 8.7 | |
|
On average, Nissan Navara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.34 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 18 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 7 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`873 | ~ 2`875 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |