Nissan Navara 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Navara is available with rear wheel drive, while Ford Ranger can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 | 2.2 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 231 HP | 150 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 - 550 NM | 375 - 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.7 seconds | 10.3 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 9.5 | 8.5 - 10.4 | |
|
On average, Nissan Navara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.34 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Navara is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1210 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`873 | ~ 1`123 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 20 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |