Nissan Murano 2002 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 333 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Murano is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Murano engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 11.8 | |
| Nissan Murano consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo XC70 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volvo XC90 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is smaller. Nissan Murano is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 923 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2005 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan Murano has more luggage space (by 310 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 168 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`295 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
| |