Nissan Murano 2002 vs Mazda CX-7 2007

 
Nissan Murano
2002 - 2008
Mazda CX-7
2007 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.5 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 248 HP238 HP
Torque: 333 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds8.3 seconds
Mazda CX-7 is a more dynamic driving.
Nissan Murano engine produces 10 HP more power than Mazda CX-7, but torque is 17 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Despite the higher power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.311.5
The Mazda CX-7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Nissan Murano consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 82 litres69 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway740 km on highway
Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.68 m
Width: 1.88 m1.87 m
Height: 1.69 m1.64 m
Nissan Murano is larger.
Nissan Murano is 9 cm longer than the Mazda CX-7, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 923 litres400 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2005 litres774 litres
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity.
Nissan Murano has 523 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 1231 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`2952`270
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 26002600
Pros and Cons: Nissan Murano has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mazda CX-7 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv