Nissan Murano 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 248 HP | 201 HP | |
Torque: | 333 NM | 307 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Nissan Murano is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Murano engine produces 47 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 26 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 13.2 | |
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Nissan Murano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 25 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
Nissan Murano is larger, but lower. Nissan Murano is 2 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 978 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2005 litres | 1909 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Nissan Murano has 55 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan Murano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 96 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`295 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 5600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |