Nissan Murano 2002 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Murano) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Honda CR-V) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 333 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan Murano is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Murano engine produces 108 HP more power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 7 NM less than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 6.7 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 5.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 840 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Murano is 13 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 10 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2005 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Nissan Murano has 398 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 1053 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`295 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |