Nissan Murano 2002 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Murano) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 333 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Murano engine produces 148 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 93 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is larger. Nissan Murano is 27 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 23 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2005 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`295 kg | 2`835 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`845 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 450 kg | 1`105 kg | |
| Nissan Murano load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is more than two times less than Mitsubishi L 200. Therefore, Mitsubishi L 200 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |