Nissan Murano 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Murano) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 333 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Murano is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Murano engine produces 58 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, but torque is 107 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 10.2 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is smaller. Nissan Murano is 3 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2005 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`295 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |