Nissan Murano 2002 vs Land Rover Discovery 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 219 HP | |
| Torque: | 333 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan Murano is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Murano engine produces 29 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, but torque is 32 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. Thanks to more power Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 15.0 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the Nissan Murano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is smaller. Nissan Murano is 8 cm shorter than the Land Rover Discovery, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 1192 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1192 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 923 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2005 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`295 | 3`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
| |