Nissan Murano 2008 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 334 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Murano engine produces 66 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 106 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 13.5 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Nissan Murano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | Used also on Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Nissan Murano is 2 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 402 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 211 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |