Nissan Murano 2008 vs Mazda CX-7 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 334 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Murano engine produces 11 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Due to the lower power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 11.0 | |
| Nissan Murano consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Nissan Murano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is larger. Nissan Murano is 15 cm longer than the Mazda CX-7, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 774 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-7 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Murano has 53 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. This could mean that the Nissan Murano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | 2`301 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |