Nissan Murano 2010 vs Subaru B9 Tribeca 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 255 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 334 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Murano engine produces 5 HP less power than Subaru B9 Tribeca, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Subaru B9 Tribeca. Despite less power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 11.6 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, which means that by driving the Nissan Murano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is larger. Nissan Murano and Subaru B9 Tribeca are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 235 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Nissan Murano has 167 litres more trunk space than the Subaru B9 Tribeca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`380 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
| |