Nissan Murano 2011 vs Subaru B9 Tribeca 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Murano engine produces 70 HP less power than Subaru B9 Tribeca, but torque is 100 NM more than Subaru B9 Tribeca. Due to the lower power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 11.6 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, which means that by driving the Nissan Murano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 540 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is larger. Nissan Murano and Subaru B9 Tribeca are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 235 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Nissan Murano has 167 litres more trunk space than the Subaru B9 Tribeca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`495 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
| |