Nissan Murano 2011 vs Porsche Cayenne 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Murano engine produces 50 HP less power than Porsche Cayenne, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Porsche Cayenne. Due to the lower power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Murano consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Murano consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Porsche Cayenne engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Nissan Murano is 1 cm longer than the Porsche Cayenne, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 670 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1780 litres | |
|
Porsche Cayenne has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Murano has 268 litres less trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. This could mean that the Nissan Murano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Murano is 0.1 metres less than that of the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`495 | 2`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 19 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |