Nissan Murano 2011 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 292 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Murano engine produces 102 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.5 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Nissan Murano is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 784 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Murano has 382 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the Nissan Murano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Murano is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`495 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 39 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |