Nissan Murano 2008 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Nissan Murano engine produces 50 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.5 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Murano engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 28 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is larger. Nissan Murano is 31 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Murano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`342 kg | 2`160 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`895 kg | 1`617 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 447 kg | 543 kg | |
| Nissan Murano load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |