Nissan Murano 2008 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Nissan Murano engine produces 50 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.5 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Murano engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is larger. Nissan Murano is 31 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Murano has 154 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Nissan Murano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`342 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |