Nissan Murano 2008 vs Mercedes ML 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Nissan Murano and Mercedes ML have the same engine power, but Nissan Murano torque is 10 NM more than Mercedes ML. Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.4 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Nissan Murano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 28 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes R klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mercedes ML engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.82 m | |
| Nissan Murano is 5 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Murano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`342 kg | 2`830 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`895 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 447 kg | 720 kg | |
| Nissan Murano load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 61 procentiem less than Mercedes ML. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |