Nissan Murano 2008 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Commander is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Murano engine produces 28 HP less power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Jeep Commander. Due to the lower power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 10.8 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that by driving the Nissan Murano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 28 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Commander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Commander 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.83 m | |
| Nissan Murano is 4 cm longer than the Jeep Commander, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1940 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Nissan Murano has 190 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`342 kg | 3`500 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`895 kg | 2`245 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 447 kg | 1`255 kg | |
| Nissan Murano load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is more than two times less than Jeep Commander. Therefore, Jeep Commander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |