Nissan Murano 2014 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Murano) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo XC90) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Murano engine produces 24 HP more power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 145 NM less than Volvo XC90. Despite the higher power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 5.8 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 660 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is smaller. Nissan Murano is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1897 litres | 1886 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 11 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`750 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |