Nissan Murano 2014 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Murano) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Jeep Grand Cherokee) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Murano engine produces 2 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 245 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 7.5 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Nissan Murano is 7 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1897 litres | 1554 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Nissan Murano has 127 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 343 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 24 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |