Nissan Murano 2014 vs Mazda CX-9 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 249 HP | 277 HP | |
Torque: | 325 NM | 367 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Nissan Murano engine produces 28 HP less power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Mazda CX-9. Despite less power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 11.3 | |
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Nissan Murano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 76 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 25 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.90 m | 5.10 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.73 m | |
Nissan Murano is smaller. Nissan Murano is 20 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 4 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | 487 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 909 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1897 litres | 2852 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 955 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`712 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 21 200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |