Nissan Murano 2014 vs Mazda CX-9 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Murano engine produces 24 HP less power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 11.3 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Nissan Murano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is smaller. Nissan Murano is 20 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 909 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1897 litres | 2852 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 955 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |