Nissan Murano 2014 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 368 NM | 258 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Murano is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Murano engine produces 60 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Thanks to more power Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.1 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda CX-5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is larger. Nissan Murano is 35 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 8 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1897 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Nissan Murano has 403 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 277 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`135 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |