Nissan Murano 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Murano) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 292 HP | |
| Torque: | 368 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Murano engine produces 38 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 232 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.5 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Nissan Murano is 5 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1897 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Nissan Murano has 125 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 3`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 20 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |