Nissan Murano 2014 vs BMW X6 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Murano) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW X6) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 368 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Murano engine produces 4 HP less power than BMW X6, whereas torque is 192 NM less than BMW X6. Due to the lower power, Nissan Murano reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 6.0 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Murano consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Murano could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1410 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1540 km on highway | ||
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X6 2012 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X6 2012 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is smaller. Nissan Murano is 1 cm shorter than the BMW X6, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1897 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Murano has 329 litres more trunk space than the BMW X6. The BMW X6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
BMW X6 has
| |