Nissan Murano 2014 vs Toyota Highlander 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 254 HP | 188 - 296 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 - 368 NM | 252 - 358 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 8.3 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 10.2 | 9.5 - 10.7 | |
|
Nissan Murano petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Highlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.77 m | |
| Nissan Murano and Toyota Highlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | 269 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1897 litres | 813 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Nissan Murano has 640 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Highlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 1084 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`677 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
| |