Nissan Murano 2014 vs Mazda CX-9 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 | 3.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 254 HP | 273 - 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 - 368 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 8.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 10.2 | 11.3 | |
|
Nissan Murano petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-9. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is smaller. Nissan Murano is 20 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Murano is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1897 litres | 2852 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Murano has 422 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-9. The Mazda CX-9 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 955 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`712 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
| |