Nissan Murano 2014 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Murano is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-5 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 254 HP | 155 - 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 - 368 NM | 196 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 8.3 seconds | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 10.2 | 5.8 - 7.2 | |
|
Nissan Murano petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is larger. Nissan Murano is 35 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 8 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1897 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage capacity. Nissan Murano has 403 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 277 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |