Nissan Murano 2008 vs Toyota RAV4 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Murano is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Toyota RAV4 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 | 2.0 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 256 HP | 150 - 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 334 - 450 NM | 198 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 10.5 seconds | 9.3 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 10.9 | 6.0 - 11.2 | |
|
Nissan Murano petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Nissan Murano equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Nissan Murano is larger. Nissan Murano is 50 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Murano is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 402 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Murano has 48 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Nissan Murano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`326 | ~ 2`181 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Murano has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |